Photo : Messenger
In the ever-evolving landscape of global finance, the question of whether distinct accounting standards are essential for Islamic finance continues to intrigue scholars and industry experts. This exploration gains significance when juxtaposed with the International Accounting Standards Board's assertion that assessing the nature of assets, liabilities, and equity demands attention to underlying substance and economic reality, transcending mere legal form.
A recent study, that analyzes Islamic and conventional contracts, suggests a certain symmetry in their treatment. The findings prompt consideration of the applicability of international accounting standards in Islamic banking. Contrary to common perception, Sharia compliance doesn't necessitate a wholesale departure in record-keeping practices for material transactions in Islamic banking when compared to their conventional counterparts.
One crucial consideration arises in ensuring that Islamic banks shield clients from losses, opting instead for mechanisms like profit equalization reserves and acquiring non-performing assets within investment pools on behalf of shareholders. In such scenarios, the question arises: is there a compelling reason to categorize investment accounts, particularly those based on Mudarabah, as equity rather than liability?
Similarly, if financing modes like Murabaha involve two distinct sales in different legs of the financial structure, the argument extends to whether recording these transactions should mirror the approach taken by manufacturing concerns. The study contends that, in essence, the economic outcomes of Islamic finance transactions may not significantly differ from conventional ones, prompting a reevaluation of the necessity for distinct accounting standards.
However, interpreting the study's results requires caution. It’s aim not to challenge the Sharia’h basis or legitimacy of Islamic financing but to scrutinize whether the financial flows and eventual economic outcomes of Islamic finance transactions merit unique accounting standards.
To avoid potential misinterpretations, it is crucial to recognize that technical specialists in accounting, risk, and law might struggle to discern distinctions in Islamic finance beyond price considerations and eventual economic outcomes. This acknowledgment is pivotal to appreciating the complexities involved in Islamic finance contracts fully.
While Islamic banking may not demand a complete overhaul of accounting practices, certain nuances cannot be overlooked. Islamic banks, for instance, cannot classify amounts received in lieu of delayed payments as income. Equity investments may require charitable contributions to purify dividends, and Ijarah transactions mandate withholding initial installments as rental income until assets are delivered in usable condition to clients.
In response to these intricacies, the Accounting and Auditing Organization for Islamic Financial Institutions (AAOIFI) has issued supplementary accounting standards. These standards aim to ensure that distinctions specific to Islamic banking are not disregarded, even if they aren't incorporated into global accounting standards for banks. AAOIFI's proactive approach in disseminating a comprehensive list of standards underscores a commitment to raising awareness and fostering appreciation for the unique elements within Islamic banking.
As a progressive development, an increasing number of countries are adopting these standards, reflecting a global acknowledgment of the distinctiveness of Islamic finance and the need for tailored accounting practices. The ongoing discourse underscores the importance of a nuanced and balanced approach to accounting in the ever-evolving world of Islamic finance.
The progressive adoption of these standards by an increasing number of countries reflects a growing awareness of the distinct elements within Islamic banking and the need for tailored accounting practices. The journey towards harmonizing accounting standards in the diverse world of Islamic finance underscores the importance of striking a delicate balance between preserving tradition and adapting to the evolving global financial landscape. As financial institutions continue to navigate these complexities, the call for nuanced and specialized accounting standards in Islamic finance resonates as a crucial step towards achieving equilibrium in the realm of international finance.
The author is the Managing Director & CEO of National Bank Limited. He is a fellow member of the Institute of Cost & Management Accountants of Bangladesh (ICMAB) and the first Certified Sustainability Reporting Assurer (CSRA) in Bangladesh. He is also a post-graduate diploma from the Institute of Islamic Banking & Insurance (IIBI), United Kingdom.
Messenger/Fameema
